Though June, July and August might seem like ages away, many conferences use January as their deadline for submissions from students. So today is as good a time as any to talk about a type of submission that can seem foreign to a lot of library students- the poster session.
This is a general guide for crafting stand-out conference paper abstracts. It includes recommendations for the content and presentation of the abstract, as well as examples of the best abstracts submitted to the abstract selection committee for the ninth annual North Carolina State University graduate student history conference.
Typically, an abstract describes the topic you would like to present at the conference, highlighting your argument, evidence and contribution to the historical literature. It is usually restricted to words. The word limit can be challenging: Graduate students who approach the abstract early, plan accordingly, and carefully edit are the ones most often invited to present their research.
Follow the basic guidelines below and avoid common pitfalls and you will greatly improve your abstract. Quick Tips Comply Diligently follow all abstract style and formatting guidelines. Most CFPs will specify page or word length, and perhaps some layout or style guidelines.
Some CFPs, however, will list very specific restrictions, including font, font size, spacing, text justification, margins, how to present quotes, how to present authors and works, whether to include footnotes or not.
Make sure that you strictly adhere to all guidelines, including submission instructions. If a CFP does not provide abstract style and formatting guidelines, it is generally appropriate to stay around words — abstract committees read a lot of these things and do not look fondly on comparatively long abstracts.
Be Concise With a word limit, write only what is necessary, avoiding wordiness. Use active voice and pay attention to excessive prepositional phrasing.
Be Clear Plan your abstract carefully before writing it.
A good abstract will address the following questions: What is the historical question or problem? It should be original. What is your evidence? State forthrightly that you are using primary source material. How does your paper fit into the historiography? Why does it matter? We know the topic is important to you, why should it be important to the abstract selection committee?
You should be as specific as possible, avoiding overly broad or overreaching statements and claims.Jan 17, · A poster session is usually listed as such and you designate it as such when you submit it (and it will be listed as such in the conference program). (On the other hand, if you submitted a paper presentation to a conference you would have designated it for consideration as such - and often there are separate guidelines for that).
Writing a Successful Poster Abstract Deborah Klein, MSN, RN, ACNS-BC, CCRN, CHFN, FAHA poster at a conference. Barriers to Writing and Submitting an Abstract • Read published abstracts from last conference and/or on similar subject or study design.
In addition to a title/author label and abstract, most successful post-ers provide brief statements of introduction, method, subjects, pro- meeting. Electrical outlets, projection equipment and tape recorders high for the top of your poster space.
Prepare an abstract . Virtual Poster Showcase. Writing an Abstract. Writing an Abstract. Other resources for writing an abstract. From a professor at Georgia State University (refers specifically how to write an abstract for a GSA Conference) From the National Center for Biotechnology Information; Back to Virtual Poster .
In general, the body of most posters will have the following elements: Abstract The abstract of your study should summarize your research.
The abstract should (1) describe the problem that prompted your research, (2) explain your approach to the problem, and (3) outline of the scope of your project.
How to Write an Abstract (for a presentation or poster) An abstract is a brief proposal that describes what your presentation intends to offer. The trick, though, is to describe the presentation as though it has already been finished, regardless of how much actual work has been done on it.